Analysts under rising data pressure
Analysts in the commodity sector work in an environment where data volumes, data sources and reporting obligations increase faster than teams can adapt. Every year brings more feeds from Platts, Argus, ICE, or Kpler; more operational data from terminals and shipping systems; and more internal requests for exposure views, price decks, or scenario analyses.
Instead of focusing on interpretation and insight, analysts spend a significant portion of their time downloading files, transforming formats, checking quality issues, and manually merging datasets. These tasks are essential but repetitive, and they scale poorly as data complexity grows.
Data workflow automation addresses this pressure by replacing manual, analyst-driven steps with automated pipelines for ingestion, validation, transformation and reporting. For trading, risk, and analytics teams, the value lies not only in speed but in consistency: when core datasets update themselves reliably, analysts can reallocate hours of manual work toward analysis and decision support.
In addition, AI components can support analysts by identifying unusual patterns, summarising dataset changes, or highlighting areas where data structures shift, reducing the need for manual inspection.
Where analysts lose the most time today (real industry patterns)
In most commodity organizations, analysts spend more time preparing data than analyzing it. The bottlenecks are consistent across oil, gas, power, metals, and agriculture, regardless of company size.
- Manual data downloads and ingestion
Analysts frequently download files from Platts, Argus, ICE, or other market data providers, often in inconsistent structures and formats. Each feed requires manual mapping before it can be used in models or dashboards.
- Excel-heavy transformations
Many trading, risk, and operations processes still rely on complex spreadsheets for filtering, pivoting, merging, and cleansing data. These steps are repeatable, but difficult to maintain and prone to silent errors.
- Inconsistent data formats and naming
Differences in units, granularities, time zones, or product naming require manual reconciliation. Even small mismatches force analysts to rebuild joins and lookup rules each day or week.
- Quality checks and exception handling
Analysts spend hours identifying gaps, duplicates, or outliers in price curves, fundamentals or operational datasets. These checks are essential, but repetitive and rarely automated. AI can complement these checks by flagging anomalies or structural inconsistencies that rule-based validation may not detect, offering contextual summaries rather than raw error logs.
- Ad-hoc reporting for traders and managers
Price decks, exposure updates, or scenario comparisons are often built manually. Each request requires reassembling datasets that already exist but are not yet automated into a repeatable workflow.
Across teams, the pattern is the same: manual work expands as data grows, and the operating model scales only linearly. This is where data workflow automation starts to create clear efficiency gains.
What data workflow automation actually changes (real mechanics)
Data workflow automation replaces manual, repetitive steps with predictable, rule-based processes that run reliably without analyst intervention. Instead of treating each dataset as a one-off task, teams build automated ingestion, transformation, and reporting pipelines that execute on a schedule or trigger.
- Automated ingestion (from providers and internal systems)
Data from Platts, Argus, ICE, or internal operational systems is ingested automatically through APIs, SFTP drops, or streaming feeds. This eliminates daily manual downloads and ensures that updates arrive in a consistent structure.
- ETL/ELT automation
Pipelines clean, transform, and model datasets without opening Excel or writing new scripts each time. Rules for units, time zones, naming, merging or aggregation run the same way on every refresh – removing variability and cutting preparation time from hours to minutes.
- Data quality automation
Validation steps such as missing data checks, outlier detection or schema mismatches execute automatically. Instead of scanning spreadsheets for errors, analysts receive alerts only when anomalies occur.
AI modules enhance quality workflows by highlighting unusual deviations, emerging patterns, or structural changes that deterministic rules alone may not capture.
Learn how AI supports data quality and anomaly detection.
- Automated enrichment and mapping
Cross-provider mapping (e.g., Argus vs Platts product names), instrument alignment, curve building or joining fundamentals with prices all follow predefined rules. Analysts no longer rebuild formulas or lookup tables for each new dataset.
- Automated reporting and dashboards
Price decks, exposure summaries, operational updates, and scenario reports refresh automatically based on the latest validated datasets. Reporting becomes repeatable, and analysts spend their time interpreting results, not assembling them.
AI-supported tools can also summarise refreshed datasets or generate preliminary commentary, giving analysts a head start before deeper interpretation.
Together, these mechanics turn data preparation into a structured, auditable workflow, a shift that materially changes the speed and reliability of analytical work across trading desks.
Impact on analysts: from manual tasks to higher-value work
When core data workflows run automatically, analysts shift from operational maintenance to analytical interpretation. The change is not abstract because it affects day-to-day workflows in quantifiable ways.
- More time for actual analysis
Hours previously spent downloading, cleaning, or stitching datasets are redirected to exploring market structure, testing assumptions, or building scenario views for traders and managers.
- Access to larger and more complex datasets
With automated ingestion and transformation, analysts can work with deeper historical data, more providers, or higher-frequency updates without creating new manual overhead.
- Faster response to trading and risk questions
Exposure updates, pricing comparisons, or curve validations can be produced within minutes rather than hours because validated datasets are always ready for use.
- Fewer errors and more consistent outputs
Automation removes silent Excel errors, inconsistent formulas, and ad-hoc transformations – improving confidence in the numbers that support trading decisions.
- Clearer workflow ownership
Standardized pipelines make it easier for teams to collaborate: analysts know how datasets are constructed, engineers know where logic sits, and traders know what each report represents.
For most organizations, the outcome is the same: analysts recover time and cognitive capacity previously consumed by manual processing, and trading desks receive higher-quality insights delivered faster and with greater reliability.
Before automation/After automation – practical comparison
Data workflow automation reshapes analysts’ work most clearly when comparing typical processes side by side. The examples below reflect real patterns across trading, risk and analytics teams.
Market data ingestion
Before: Analyst downloads Platts or Argus files → manually checks structure → maps columns → merges with internal datasets.
After: Automated ingestion via API/SFTP → schema mapped once → data lands in a standardized format ready for use. AI can then monitor for unusual deviations or format changes, alerting teams proactively.
Transformations and data preparation
Before: Filtering, pivoting, unit conversions and lookups in Excel; repeated each day or week.
After: ELT/ETL pipelines apply the same transformation rules reliably on every refresh.
Data quality checks
Before: Analyst scans spreadsheets for gaps, duplicates or anomalies.
After: Validation rules run automatically; analysts review only flagged exceptions.
AI provides contextual summaries, helping diagnose emerging issues faster.
Reporting and updates
Before: Manually assembling price decks, exposure updates or scenario comparisons.
After: Reports refresh automatically based on validated datasets; analysts focus on interpreting the results.
AI can generate draft summaries or highlight notable changes for further review.
Across these processes, the shift is consistent: from manual effort to reliable, repeatable workflows that free analysts to focus on insight rather than assembly.
See how automated data workflows are structured in NorthGravity Platform.
Where automation delivers the fastest ROI
Not every workflow needs automation at once. In most commodity organizations, several areas consistently deliver the fastest and clearest returns, both in analyst hours saved and in the reliability of trading decisions.
- Market data ingestion (Platts, Argus, ICE, etc.)
Automating ingestion removes daily manual downloads and ensures consistent structures across providers. This is usually the highest-volume, highest-friction workflow for analysts.
- Automated data reporting
Price decks, exposure summaries and recurring operational updates are prime candidates for automation. Reports become fully repeatable – analysts spend time interpreting them instead of assembling them.
- ETL/ELT pipelines for transformations
Unit conversions, mapping rules, curve construction, cross-provider alignment – all are easy to automate and high-impact. They reduce error risk and eliminate repetitive Excel work.
- Data quality automation
Automated validation (gaps, duplicates, schema mismatches) prevents issues from reaching analysis or trading decisions. Teams move from reactive error-fixing to proactive quality control.
- Preparing datasets for risk, forecasting and ML
Analysts spend substantial time shaping data for risk models or forecasting tools. Automating these preparatory steps shortens model cycles and improves consistency across runs.
- AI-assisted anomaly detection and interpretation
AI modules enhance rule-based quality checks by identifying unusual behaviours in price curves, fundamentals or operational data. This reduces the time analysts spend diagnosing irregularities and accelerates decision support.
Across these areas, ROI is driven by the same mechanism: repeatable logic + reliable automation = more analyst time devoted to decision support.
How to get started – simple, non-technical steps
Teams don’t need to automate everything at once. A phased, practical approach works best, even for organizations early in their data journey.
Step 1 – Map current workflows
Identify all recurring tasks handled by analysts: data downloads, transformations, QC steps, reporting cycles.
This creates a clear picture of where the time goes.
Step 2 – Select high-frequency, rule-based processes
Prioritize tasks that follow predictable logic and occur daily or weekly.
These deliver the fastest impact once automated.
Step 3 – Build your first automated pipeline
Start with one ingestion + transformation flow.
Even a single automated pipeline can eliminate hours of repetitive work.
Step 4 – Expand to reporting and QC automation
Once data refreshes reliably, automate reports and validation rules.
This closes the loop between ingestion, preparation and output.
Step 5 – Establish ownership and monitoring
Define who owns transformation logic, QC rules and reporting outputs.
Clear ownership ensures consistency as workflows scale.
A step-by-step approach reduces complexity and creates early wins that build confidence across trading, risk and analytics teams.
Conclusion: Automation as a foundation, not a shortcut
Data workflow automation is not about replacing analysts, but about giving them the infrastructure to work with scale, consistency, and clarity.
AI-supported tools can focus on pattern detection and contextual interpretation. Analysts regain time for higher-value thinking, and trading desks receive insights that are both faster and better grounded in validated data.
For trading organizations, the result is a more resilient operating model, fewer errors and faster access to the insights needed to act.
Speak with our data experts to identify where automation can reduce your team’s manual workload.
.jpg)